Dear A,
Believe it or not, when I attempt to communicate with you, I pray first. I reflect long and hard. I choose my words carefully. I try to do no harm.
I KNOW you have found that hard to believe since what occurred in February. But I am going to have another go now, six months on and with plenty of water under the bridge.
I KNOW that some of my words hurt you badly. That is an index of how highly you valued my opinion. And I appreciate that.
But if you look carefully at all of the emails I sent, you will see that in the very first one I said ‘I want to make this easier for you, not harder’ and ‘Please, A, don’t let us let this affect our friendship’.
It was never ever going to be easy to tell a close and much loved friend that I didn’t like something she did.
If I had been allowed to stay on the course, as I clearly expressed my wish to, it would have been very different.
There is a difference between having a close, much-loved friend tell me she didn’t like some of my actions, and having that same friend exclude, ostracise and send me to Coventry (along with others) for expressing contrary opinions.
Maybe you think what you’ve done is take me to task for ‘abusiveness’ and ‘aggression’? It isn’t really good enough. You have to be more specific. You also have to take what I said in the context where it was spoken. You were not in the room. However you did know that B had told, not asked or suggested, TOLD me not to return to the course. Giving no reasons. In an ansaphone message. After the first day when in actual fact I had really not said all that much.
A, the reason she did that, I would suggest, is that I was openly critical of her training style in an email to N after the first day. I said she was too bossy and that she should understand that the participants, and not she, are the experts on mental health conditions and how they affect their lives.
Of course, when I did go back on the third day, I did not feel welcome. Of course I was aware of some hostility toward me. If I came across as ‘aggressive’ that day, it was because I already felt my rights had been violated to some degree. My right to an opinion. My right to openly express what I thought. My right to attend a course I had started in an organisation I was part of, and which I had supported as a volunteer. I could not attend on the second day because I did not feel well. For no other reason. That should not have been used as a reason to bump me off the course. I could have easily been given the literature on the DDA and told to catch up on it.
Anyway. Getting back to what I said about ‘telling a close and much loved friend I did not like something she did’. What exactly is it that I did or said which you did not like?
You have never been specific. Instead there was a blanket condemnation of me as ‘aggressive’ and ‘abusive’. As I say. Not really good enough. Followed up by ostracisation, and silence in the face of my many entreaties for a dialogue. No attempt to look at Equals’ actions. Or if you did you concluded that they were all perfectly correct.
A, this has all affected me more than I can say. It has truly been an annus horribilis for me. What you might not understand, as you have a partner who will staunchly defend you whether you are right or wrong, is that R watched me gradually fall apart over this, but felt able to take no action except to tell me I needed to think about how I could have done things differently.
But A. I did and said what I did because I believed I had a right to my own independent opinion. For no other reason. Not to hurt anyone. Especially not you.
A, I still love you very much and I always will. It was some of your actions I did not approve of. You as a person I esteem and value very highly.
Even if I didn’t like your course, at the end of the day so what? It’s not the same as saying I don’t like you! It’s as if you came to the Clarendon, saw some of my pictures on the wall and said to me ‘Oh Zoë, you could really do so much better than that!’ A bit hurtful maybe. Not a reason to break up a close and wonderful ten-year friendship!
It’s not the same, either, as excluding someone and sending them to Coventry for expressing contrary opinions to the trainer, or even being (politely and courteously) critical in a private email to N after the first day. I genuinely thought my opinions would be sought after and valued. Why wouldn’t they? I am a long-term dyed in the wool mental health service user, and I was a volunteer for you! I’d given up many hours of my life for Equals in one way and another, many of them listening to you talk about them for about four years since their inception. My partner was working for you too. I had every reason in the world to want it to be a roaring success.
A, R has been very much affected by this. J has been dragged into it too. It has affected everyone around me who has seen my health deteriorate over the last six months as I struggled to maintain my close relationship with R, and to save my friendship with you…against all the odds. Even my son is affected. I have not been well enough to see him for four months now…that hasn’t happened before in the whole history of his time in care.
Please know that I will always love you very much and I am desperately sorry for causing you hurt, but try to see that what has happened to me goes way beyond hurt. You and R were my two closest people, and I have effectively lost both of you. Explain to me exactly where I went wrong A, but you need to be more specific than just vague use of the old stand-bys ‘abusive’ and ‘aggressive’. You actually know me better than that. NO ONE is exclusively those things in any case.
Condemn my actions by all means. Specify where I went so badly wrong. Show me the error of my ways. But don’t condemn me wholesale as a person. That is demonisation. It is futile, damaging and always wrong, and it is even more harmful to the demoniser than the demonised in the long run.
I am going to copy this letter to N and R.
Much love, as always, Zoë